Reporter Dennis Nartker says Ghost Hunters (TAPS) are ’so-called professionals’
Aug. 01, 2009, under Ghost News

Nartker says Ghost Hunters are, "hokey"
In his riveting article (not really), Nartker passionately writes, “I watched only long enough to conclude the show was hokey, lacked spontaneity like a good reality show and was about as entertaining as a Roseanne re-run. I changed channels.”
Nartker’s article really heats up when he begins to tell us about a book called, “South Bend Ghosts and Other Northern Indiana Haunts,” referring to some of the book’s information as, “nonsense because I don’t believe any of it.”
Nartker finally reveals his adventurous side when he writes about his daring Halloween visit to a cemetery called, Spook Hill.
“One member of the group whispered for everyone to stop and not make a sound. We froze in our tracks for a few seconds and the only thing I remember hearing was the rustling of leaves in the wind until a jokster kicked a rock or a stick. We ran down the hill, jumped in the car and left,” Nartker writes.
Paranormal Daily News’ take: We’ve got Ghost Hunter’s (TAPS) and every other ghost hunter’s back. We believe and we take this “nonsense” very seriously.
Read his full article and leave him a comment on his page here
Related Articles
- Ghost Hunters (TAPS) has just gotten bigger
- Ghost Hunters (TAPS) continue with ratings success
- TAPS holds ghost hunter training at the Spalding Inn
- Win an amazing adventure with television’s Ghost Hunters (TAPS)
- The countdown has begun for the new season of Ghost Hunters
- Ghost Hunters spin-off featuring Gonsalves and Tango
- REVIEW: Ghost Hunters International, Season 2, Episode 1
- Ghost Hunters Academy recruits to make their debut October 31st
- Ghost Hunters International new episodes on Sci Fi July 8
- “Ghost Hunters” (TAPS) visits Brentsville

August 1st, 2009 on 11:23 am
Yeah, I read this guys article and this site got it right I don’t understand how on earth you could not like TAPS
August 1st, 2009 on 3:59 pm
Personally I agree. I’m involved with an investigative team and this show makes us all look bad in my opinion. Especially with all the evidence you can find online that they do fake certain things. I even remember seeing a “behind the scenes” shot of them and while you only see 2 people on camera they have anywhere from 5-8 people in there with them. Very hard to be “professional’ under those circumstances. And I don’t find it as entertaining as it use to be. They “ACT” way over the top…
August 2nd, 2009 on 8:50 am
How could anyone thing TAPS are hokey? Ghost hunting takes time and it not terribly exciting until afterwards when you review evidence, most often with no guarantee. I don’t like seeing people write that they don’t believe. It’s ignorant.
August 2nd, 2009 on 10:18 am
How can you even compare Ghost Hunters to the fat slob Roseanne Bar!!! I LOVE TAPS!!!
August 2nd, 2009 on 2:51 pm
TAPS IS THE BEST JASON AND GRANT RULE!!!
August 7th, 2009 on 1:38 pm
So, this so-called reporter is basing his opinion on GH when he states he didn’t even watch the entire show. Yeah, nice reporting there bucko!
December 17th, 2009 on 1:17 pm
Have any of you ever bothered to look up the scientific credibility of ANYTHING that TAPS does? You call unbelievers “ignorant” in the most ironic twist possible when taking in to consideration the fact that all basic, modern science has shown every claim by “ghost hunters” to be a deluded, idiotic twist of a simple, every-day phenomenon. “spirit balls” on photos appear all the time, and are the result of light reflecting from dust particles. Ghostly figures frequently have no definite shape or identification to them until someone else SUGGESTS that there’s more than meets the eye there. It is a purely psychological hallucination – wishful thinking more than likely.
Incredible, isn’t it, that after hundreds of years of millions of people claiming to see ghosts all the time, no one has ever been able to produce a single piece of credible ghost evidence. Also note how similar ghost sightings are to what we see in hollywood and on television. Sounds rather similar to how whenever people see aliens, the aliens always look exactly like the creatures we see in movies and the media, despite the fact that all common sense would tell us that if intelligent extraterrestrials exist, they don’t look even remotely similar to us. It would not be a stretch to say that we would not even be able to identify them as intelligent beings at first.
Oh, and I hope you are also aware that EMVs are the result of electric circuits – things which exist in abundance in any home.
http://www.squidoo.com/debunking_ghosthunters#module10553912
enlighten yourselves, and quit feeding your primitive fears.