
Hoax theorists point to the "rippling" flag as evidence the landings were faked; there is no wind on the moon.
(CNN) — It captivated millions of people around the world for eight days in the summer of 1969. It brought glory to the embattled U.S. space program and inspired beliefs that anything was possible. It’s arguably the greatest technological feat of the 20th century – And to some, it was all a lie.
Conspiracy theorists believe NASA faked the Apollo moon landings and that the U.S. wanted to avoid embarrassment by trumping the Soviets. A recent poll shows nearly 10 percent of Americans do not believe we were ever there…
Forty years after Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin set foot on the moon, a small cult of conspiracy theorists maintains the historic event — and the five subsequent Apollo moon landings — were staged. These people believe NASA fabricated the landings to trump their Soviet rivals and fulfill President Kennedy’s goal of ferrying humans safely to and from the moon by the end of the 1960s.
“I do know the moon landings were faked,” said crusading filmmaker Bart Sibrel, whose aggressive interview tactics once provoked Aldrin to punch him in the face. “I’d bet my life on it.”
Sibrel may seem crazy, but he has company. A 1999 Gallup poll found that a scant 6 percent of Americans doubted the Apollo 11 moon landing happened, and there is anecdotal evidence that the ranks of such conspiracy theorists, fueled by innuendo-filled documentaries and the Internet, are growing.
Twenty-five percent of respondents to a survey in the British magazine Engineering & Technology said they do not believe humans landed on the moon. A handful of Web sites and blogs circulate suspicions about NASA’s “hoax.”
And a Google search this week for “Apollo moon landing hoax” yielded more than 1.5 billion results.
Conspiracy theories about the Apollo missions began not long after the last astronaut returned from the moon in 1972. Bill Kaysing, a technical writer for Rocketdyne, which built rocket engines for NASA’s Apollo program, published a 1974 book, “We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle.”
In the book and elsewhere, Kaysing argued that NASA lacked the technology in 1969 to land humans safely on the moon, that the Apollo astronauts would have been poisoned by passing through the Van Allen radiation belts that ring the Earth and that NASA’s photos from the moon contained suspicious anomalies.
Kaysing theorized NASA sent the Apollo 11 astronauts up in a rocket until it was out of sight, then transferred the lunar capsule and its three passengers to a military cargo plane that dropped the capsule eight days later in the Pacific, where it was recovered. In the meantime, he believed, NASA officials filmed the “moon landing” at Area 51, the high-security military base in the Nevada desert, and brainwashed the astronauts to ensure their cooperation.
Some believe Kaysing’s theories inspired the 1978 movie “Capricorn One,” in which NASA fakes a Mars landing on a remote military base, then goes to desperate lengths to cover it up. Others insist NASA recruited director Stanley Kubrick, hot off “2001: A Space Odyssey,” to film the “faked” moon landings.
Oh, and those moon rocks? Lunar meteorites from Antarctica.
Decades later, Kaysing’s beliefs formed the foundation for “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?” a sensational 2001 Fox TV documentary that spotted eerie “inconsistencies” in NASA’s Apollo images and TV footage.
Among them: no blast craters are visible under the landing modules; shadows intersect instead of running parallel, suggesting the presence of an unnatural light source; and a planted American flag appears to ripple in a breeze although there’s no wind on the moon.
The hour-long special sparked such interest in the topic that NASA took the unusual step of issuing a news release and posting a point-by-point rebuttal on its Web site. The press release began: “Yes. Astronauts did land on the moon.”
In various documents, NASA has countered that the Apollo astronauts passed through the Van Allen belts too quickly to be exposed to dangerous levels of radiation; that the module’s descent engines weren’t powerful enough to leave a blast crater; that the shadows in photos were distorted by wide-angle lenses and sloping lunar terrain; and that the Apollo flags had horizontal support bars that made the flags swing.
Kaysing died in 2005, but not before grabbing the attention of Sibrel, a Nashville, Tennessee, filmmaker who has since become the most visible proponent of the Apollo hoax theories. With funding from an anonymous donor, Sibrel wrote and directed a 47-minute documentary in 2001 that reiterated many of the now-familiar hoax arguments.
Critics of moon-landing hoax theorists, and there are many, say it would be impossible for tens of thousands of NASA employees and Apollo contractors to keep such a whopping secret for almost four decades.
But Sibrel believes the Apollo program was so compartmentalized that only its astronauts and a handful of high-level NASA officials knew the entire story. Sibrel spent years ambushing Apollo astronauts and insisting they swear on a Bible before his cameras that they walked on the moon.
See the full CNN article here
Send us news to: news@paranormaldailynews.com
Follow us on Twitter: iknowwhatisaw
Related articles:
“I know what I saw” documentary exposes government cover-ups
The truth behind NASA’s UFO footage
Does NASA have UFOs?
Related posts:
- Still kept secret by NASA, Buzz Aldrin states they saw a UFO flying near them – Video of Buzz here!
- Obama’s 2011 budget effectively shuts down NASA’s effort to return astronauts to the moon
- Alien UFO bases on The Moon?
- NASA has found ‘Significant’ water on the Moon
- Real life Star Trek voyage – Volunteers wanted (The catch? It’s a one-way ticket)
- NASA: ‘We will crash a rocket into the Moon Friday morning’
- CNN: Moon hole might be suitable for colony
- CNN: Real life ‘Avatar’ moon waiting to be found
- NASA’s Alien anomalies caught on film (Video)
- NASA hits near record 6,300 astronaut applications


“and that the Apollo flags had horizontal support bars that made the flags swing.”
I call BS!! LOOK at the picture you have up there above this article and you see NO bars and the flag is NOT “swinging” it it “flapping” in some kind of breeze.
My husband and I have this argument every so often.(I was born in 1968 and he was born in 1953) I still ask WHY have they not gone back, just once, since then? He says that there is no reason to…I say prove it and go back…show us the flag that was placed…FROM the space shuttle window, BEFORE touchdown and show us Neil Armstrong’s footprints, from the shuttle, itself. I know they are going to the space station, now, so why NOT go just a little further to prove that this did happen?
if we didnt go to the moon we probally didnt even go to space period.